Gyanforge Went the AI route
Built something fast on an AI app builder. Worked fine in the demo. Broke the week real users showed up - or nobody noticed the database was wide open until it was too late.
> Outsource Experienced SaaS and Apps Builders
Looking for a tech team that feels like in-house?
Hire GyanForge Labs to:
- Build for less than an in-house hire costs
- Ship in days, not months
- Launch secure - a real person checks every release
- Work with one team, start to finish
- Scale without switching vendors
·Ex-JP Morgan technical co-founder·Built Juno Markets, First-FPV & more·Scaled NXTJob.ai and other AI SaaS to 8 figures·SalesDr.ai already live
// the problem
You’ve probably already hit one of these
Went the agency route
Got a quote. It was six figures and four months out. By the time it shipped, your funnel had already changed twice.
Neither path was built for a business moving at your speed, at your size.
// the data
41%
Increase in bug rates after teams adopt AI coding tools
src: Keyhole Software
88%
Of audited AI-built apps had database security fully disabled, not misconfigured - off
src: Creatr
8,000+
Startups that needed a partial rebuild after shipping an AI-only build; rescue jobs run $50K-$500K
src: Creatr
20-30%
Sprint capacity lost to AI-generated bugs by day 90
src: Keyhole Software
This is why “just use an AI builder” and “hire a full custom dev shop” are both the wrong answer for a business your size.
// build types in scope
- 01Custom software or internal tools for an existing business
- 02A new product or app, built from scratch
- 03Customer-facing apps, portals & dashboards
- 04CRM, ops & workflow automation
// how the hybrid model actually works
- >AI scaffolds the build fast - screens, data models, integrations - in days, not weeks
- >Every ship goes through named human review before it reaches your users; nothing goes live because “the AI said it’s done”
- >The result reads and feels hand-built - not templated, not generic, not obviously AI-generated
- >One point of contact throughout, not a support ticket queue
// selected work
Built by the same team
$ open salesdr.ai — in production
SalesDr.ai - a full lead-to-cash CRM built by this team, in production today, not a demo: pipeline and lead scoring, WhatsApp nurture, Razorpay payments, AI-powered call transcription and analysis.
// how it works
01
Submit the form
Name, email, phone, industry, concept (optional).
02
We call you first
A real, manual conversation to understand the fit; no auto-booked calendar slot.
03
If it’s a match, we schedule a fit-check call
A deeper scoping conversation, followed by a written scope, fixed price, and delivery timeline.
04
Build, human-reviewed, launched
We build, review, launch, and agree any post-launch support before work begins.
// faq
Why not just use an AI builder myself?+
You can, and plenty of founders do for a v1. This is for when that v1 needs to survive real users, real payments, and real data - exactly where AI-only builds tend to fail (see the data above).
How is this different from a normal dev agency?+
Agencies quote agency prices and timelines because they’re not using AI to cut build time. We are - without skipping the human review.
I already have something built and it’s breaking.+
That’s a rescue/rebuild conversation, not a from-scratch one - same first step, different scoping.
What happens after launch?+
Any post-launch support and ongoing changes are agreed during scoping, so the handoff is clear before work begins.
How much does this cost?+
Every build is scoped and fixed-priced individually on the call - there’s no one number that fits a CRM, an app, and an internal tool alike.